Esquema de calificación:
Investigación (explicación de historia) – 20%
|
4 Fuerte |
3 Bien |
2 Así así |
1 Debe ser mejor |
Selection of sources |
Identified 3+ highly appropriate sources |
X |
X |
Identified less than the minimum required sources. |
Note-taking & Summary |
Extracted relevant information & Summarized content using student’s own words. |
X |
X |
Extracted irrelevant information and/or Most or all of summary was copied word-for-word from the original source. |
Citation & Documentation |
Cited all sources & pictures accurately using Noodletools. |
X |
X |
Did not cite all source & pictures accurately using Noodletools. |
Language Use
|
Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression. Occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility Varied and appropriate vocabulary used with precision. Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors. . |
Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility. Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary. General control of grammar, syntax and usage. . |
Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility. Appropriate but basic vocabulary. Some control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
|
Partially understandable, with errors that force interpretation and cause confusion. Limited vocabulary. Limited control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
|
Historia escrita: 20% - Based on the writing rubric.