Español 3 (R) – Proyecto #1
Los mayas
Tema: Este proyecto es un estudio de la civilización maya en la península del Yucatán. Hay que escoger un aspecto de la civilización maya que quieras investigar, y crear una presentación oral en la que expones los resultados de tu investigación. También debe incluir un elemento visual (video, póster, presentación PowerPoint) para acompañar la presentación oral.
Desarrollo: En grupos de dos, tienen que:
Cada miembro del grupo puede disponer de una ficha con no más de diez palabras para ayudarle con su presentación oral.
Fecha límite: jueves, el 4 de octubre
Calificación: La calificación se divide en tres partes[1]:
● Presentación oral 60%
§ Uso de lengua[2] (30%)
§ Desarrollo (30%)
● Investigación 20%
● Elemento visual 20%
| 
 | 4 Demuestra excelencia | 3 Demuestra dominio | 2 Demuestra competencia | 1 Sugiere / demuestra incompetencia | 
| Selection of sources | Identified 2+ highly appropriate sources using the libguide provided. | X | X | Identified less than the minimum required sources, and/or did not use the libguide provided. | 
| Note-taking & Keywords | Extracted relevant information & Brainstormed keywords, categories, & related terms & Wrote notes including succinct key facts which directly help with the presentation. & wrote notes using student’s own words. | Extracted mostly relevant information & Selected mostly effective keywords to use in researching the topic & Wrote notes which included facts that help the presentation & wrote notes using student’s own words. | Extracted information which wasn’t relevant And /or Selected some keywords that were not effective in researching the topic And/or Wrote notes which included irrelevant facts and/or not directly relate to the presentation. And/or copied directly from the original source. | Extracted irrelevant information and/or Selected no effective keywords to use in researching the topic and/or Wrote notes which included a majority of facts which did not pertain to the presentation and/or Most or all notes were copied word-for-word from the original source. | 
| Citation & Documentation | Cited all sources & pictures accurately using Noodletools. | X | X | Did not cite all source & pictures accurately using Noodletools. | 
Esquemas de calificación
Investigación – 20%
Presentación oral – 60%
| 
 | 4 Demuestra excelencia | 3 Demuestra dominio | 2 Demuestra competencia | 1 Sugiere / demuestra falta de competencia | 
| Topic Development, Content, & Organization 40% | Treatment of topic is relevant & thorough. Information is presented clearly and concisely with logical and very well-organized flow of ideas. | Treatment of topic is relevant and well developed. Most of the information is presented in a clear, concise fashion with a logical progression of ideas. | Treatment of topic is relevant. Some of the information may not be presented clearly or concisely, and/or may lack organization. | Treatment of topic may be / is somewhat irrelevant. Information presented is unfocused, poorly organized and/or suggests little thought to being clear and concise. | 
| Language Use 40% | Correct use and control of a variety of structures with very few errors. Rich vocabulary used with precision. High level of fluency & excellent pronunciation. 
 | Use of complex structures, but may have more than a few errors. Very good variety of vocabulary used correctly. Very good fluency and pronunciation. | Control of simple structures with few errors; may use complex structures with little or no control. Good range of vocabulary, but may have occasional interference from another language. Good fluency with occasional hesitancy. Good pronunciation | Limited control of simple structures, with multiple errors. Narrow range of vocabulary; frequent interference from another language may occur. Labored expression; minimal fluency. Fair pronunciation, which may affect comprehension. | 
| Collaboration 20% | Evident that group shared equal responsibility in the creation & presentation of the project. | ----- | ----- | Evident that one member carried more weight than the other in completing and/or presenting the project. | 
Elemento visual – 20%
| 
 | 4 Demuestra excelencia | 3 Demuestra dominio | 2 Demuestra competencia | 1 Sugiere / demuestra falta de competencia | 
| Visual 50% | All visuals are clear, highly relevant, and complement the presentation very well. | Most visuals are clear, relevant, and complement the presentation well. | Some visuals may not be clear and/or may be relevant and/or may not complement the presentation. | Visuals are not clear and/or may not be relevant and/or do not complement the presentation. | 
| Creativity 50% | Visual element demonstrates a high degree of creativity. | Visual element demonstrates good creativity. | Visual element demonstrates some creativity. | Visual element demonstrates little to no creativity. | 
Grade breakdown:
4 = 100 3 = 87.5 2 = 75 1 = 62.5 0 = 0